设为首页 电子邮箱 联系我们

本刊最新招聘信息请见“通知公告”!  本刊投稿系统试运行中,欢迎投稿!如投稿有问题,可直接将稿件发送至zgyy8888@163.com

 

主管单位:中华人民共和国   

国家卫生健康委员会

主办单位:中国医师协会
总编辑:
杨秋

编辑部主任:吴翔宇

邮发代号:80-528
定价:28.00元
全年:336.00元
Email:zgyy8888@163.com
电话(传真):010-64428528;
010-64456116(总编室)

                  

过刊目录

2019 年第 8 期 第 14 卷

乳腺影像报告及数据系统联合超声造影对于良恶性乳腺肿块的诊断价值研究

Diagnostic value of breast imaging reporting and data system combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in benign and malignant breast tumors

作者:钱宇龙张一峰杨蕊

英文作者:

单位:215600江苏大学附属张家港澳洋医院超声科(钱宇龙);200072同济大学附属上海市第十人民医院超声科(张一峰);210000南京医科大学附属医院肿瘤科(杨蕊)

英文单位:

关键词:乳腺肿块;乳腺影像报告及数据系统;超声造影;良恶性;诊断价值

英文关键词:

  • 摘要:
  • 【摘要】目的    探究乳腺影像报告及数据系统(BI-RADS)结合超声造影诊断良恶性乳腺肿块的价值。方法    回顾性分析江苏大学附属张家港澳洋医院2016年8月至2018年8月收治的142例疑似乳腺癌患者,均采用BI-RADS实施分级诊断,再进行超声造影诊断。比较BI-RADS、超声造影及联合诊断的敏感度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果    142例患者共有146个肿块,其中良性85个,恶性61个。BI-RADS与超声造影诊断的敏感度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值及阴性预测值之间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。联合诊断的特异度、准确率及阳性预测值明显高于BI-RADS[91.8%(78/85)比72.9%(62/85)、91.8%(134/146)比78.8%(115/146)、88.9%(56/63)比69.7%(53/76)],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。联合诊断的敏感度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值及阴性预测值与超声造影比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论    BI-RADS结合超声造影可有效提高乳腺肿块良恶性诊断准确性,降低误诊率,为临床诊断乳腺肿块提供更为准确的影响学依据。

  • 【Abstract】Objective    To explore the value of breast imaging reporting and data system(BI-RADS) combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors. Methods    Totally 142 patients with suspected breast cancer admitted to Zhangjiagang Aoyang Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University from August 2016 to August 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were diagnosed by BI-RADS and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of BI-RADS, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and combined diagnosis were analyzed. Results    There were 146 masses including 85 benign masses and 61 malignancies in 142 patients. There were no significant differences of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value between BI-RADS and contrast-enhanced ultrasound(all P>0.05). Specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value of combined diagnosis were significantly higher than those of BI-RADS[91.8%(78/85) vs 72.9%(62/85), 91.8%(134/146) vs 78.8%(115/146), 88.9%(56/63) vs 69.7%(53/76)](all P<0.01). There were no significant differences of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value between combined diagnosis and contrast-enhanced ultrasound(all P>0.05). Conclusion    BI-RADS combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound can effectively improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce misdiagnosis rate in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors.

copyright 《中国医药》杂志编辑部
地址:北京市朝阳区安贞路2号首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院北楼二层
电话:010-64456116 传真:010-64428528 邮编:100029 Email: zgyy8888@163.com
网址:www.chinamedicinej.com 京ICP备2020043099号-3

当您在使用本网站投稿遇到困难时,请直接将稿件投送到编辑部邮箱zgyy8888@163.com。







安卓


苹果

关闭