设为首页 电子邮箱 联系我们

本刊最新招聘信息请见“通知公告”!  本刊投稿系统试运行中,欢迎投稿!如投稿有问题,可直接将稿件发送至zgyy8888@163.com

 

主管单位:中华人民共和国   

国家卫生健康委员会

主办单位:中国医师协会
总编辑:
杨秋

编辑部主任:吴翔宇

邮发代号:80-528
定价:28.00元
全年:336.00元
Email:zgyy8888@163.com
电话(传真):010-64428528;
010-64456116(总编室)

                  

过刊目录

2020 年第 8 期 第 15 卷

联合应用准分子激光冠状动脉斑块消融术和药物涂层球囊治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的观察性研究

The combined use of drug eluting balloon and excimer laser during stent treatment of coronary artery restenosis

作者:杨丽霞周玉杰王志坚史冬梅柴萌梁静张琳琳

英文作者:Yang Lixia Zhou Yujie Wang Zhijian Shi Dongmei Chai Meng Liang Jing Zhang Linlin

单位:首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心内十二病房北京市心肺血管疾病研究所100029

英文单位:The 12th Ward Department of Cardiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases Beijing 100029 China

关键词:冠状动脉支架再狭窄;准分子激光;药物球囊

英文关键词:In-stentrestenosisofcoronaryartery;Excimerlasercoronaryangioplasty;Drugelutingballoon

  • 摘要:
  • 目的 对比联合应用准分子激光冠状动脉斑块消融术(ELCA)和药物涂层球囊(DCB)与单独应用DCB治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄(ISR)的效果。方法 选取20171月至201912月在首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院应用DCB处理冠状动脉ISR并接受光学相干断层成像检查的患者32例。根据是否接受ELCA将患者分为ELCA组(应用ELCA联合DCB12例,15处病变)和对照组(单独应用DCB20例,24处病变)。比较2组光学相干断层成像测量治疗前后的即刻管腔获得、支架扩张面积及术中不良事件发生情况。结果 ELCA组即刻管腔获得明显高于对照组[(3.4±0.9mm2比(1.9±0.5mm2](P=0.03),2组支架扩张面积比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.91)。ELCA组和对照组各有1例患者DCB应用后出现A型或B型夹层,未予进一步处理。对照组1例患者第1DCB通过困难,经再次处理后第2DCB通过。ELCA1例、对照组2例出现无复流,对症治疗后好转。结论 联合应用ELCADCB治疗ISR较单独应用DCB治疗ISR能得到更大的即刻管腔获得,且不增加并发症发生率。

  • Objective To observe the effects of combined application of excimer laser coronary plaque ablation (ELCA) and drug-coated balloon (DCB) with DCB alonein patient with ISR. Methods Twelve consecutive patients treated with ELCA & DCBELCA groupand 20 consecutive patients treated with DCB standard therapycontrol group from January 2017 to December 2019 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were included; angiographic and OCT outcomes were evaluated. Lumen measurement with OCT was performed before and after procedure. The primary endpoint was OCT derived acute lumen gain. Results The lumen obtained in the ELCA group was significantly higher than that in the control group (3.4 ± 0.9) mm2 vs (1.9 ± 0.5) mm2 P=0.03; there was 1 dissection (Type A or B) in each group; 1 patient had no-reflow in ELCA group; 2 patients had no-reflow in control group. Conclusion The combination use of ELCA with DCB in patients with ISR has more acute lumen gain compared with the use of DCB; there was no significant difference of procedural complication between two groups.

copyright 《中国医药》杂志编辑部
地址:北京市朝阳区安贞路2号首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院北楼二层
电话:010-64456116 传真:010-64428528 邮编:100029 Email: zgyy8888@163.com
网址:www.chinamedicinej.com 京ICP备2020043099号-3

当您在使用本网站投稿遇到困难时,请直接将稿件投送到编辑部邮箱zgyy8888@163.com。







安卓


苹果

关闭